4.5 Article

Investigating SAPAP3 variants in the etiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder and trichotillomania in the South African white population

期刊

COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY
卷 52, 期 2, 页码 181-187

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2010.05.007

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council of South Africa
  2. National Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating psychiatric disorder characterized by repeated obsessions and compulsions. Trichotillomania (TTM), a psychiatric disorder characterized by repetitive hairpulling, is presently classified as an impulse control disorder, but has also been viewed as an obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorder. Both conditions are complex disorders, with evidence from family and twin studies indicating that their etiology includes a genetic component. Results from a recent knockout animal model suggest that SAP90/PSD95-associated protein 3 (SAPAP3) may be involved in the pathophysiology of both disorders. Methods: Seven polymorphic variants distributed across the gene encoding SAPAP3 were genotyped in South African white OCD (n = 172), TTM (n = 45), and control (n = 153) subjects. Single-locus and haplotype analyses were conducted to determine association between genetic variants and subjects with OCD, TTM, and controls. Results: Although single-locus analysis revealed a significant association between rs11583978 in SAPAP3 and TTM, this association was nonsignificant after correction for multiple testing. In the OCD group, a significant association was observed between earlier age at onset and the A-T-A-T (rs11583978-rs7541937-rs6662980-rs4652867) haplotype compared with the C-G-G-G haplotype. Conclusions: This study generated preliminary evidence to link SAPAP3 variants to the development of earlier onset OCD. Future studies should concentrate on locating the susceptibility variant(s) by focusing on functional polymorphisms within SAPAP3. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据