4.7 Article

Towards enhanced CO2 selectivity of the PIM-1 membrane by blending with polyethylene glycol

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 493, 期 -, 页码 147-155

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.077

关键词

Polymer of intrinsic microporosity; Polymer membranes; CO2 separation; PIM-1; Polyethylene glycol

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China Grant [21306155]
  2. research fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20120121120013]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012121029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polymers of intrinsic microporosity are attractive membrane materials for gas separation due to their high specific surface and microporous structure. PIM-1 being the most representative one shows extremely high permeability but moderate selectivity for CO2 separation. In this study, the CO2 selectivity of PIM-1 is remarkably enhanced via blending with polyethylene glycol (PEG). A series of PIM-1/PEG blended membranes are prepared for separation of CO2/N-2, CO2/CH4 by varying the molecular weight (MW) and content of PEG. Their structure and physicochemical properties are explicitly characterized including density, morphology and thermostability. The blended membranes have less d-spacing of packed chains than pure PIM-1. The pure gas permeabilities of CO2, N-2 and CH4 are measured with varying MW and content of PEG. The PEG blend depresses gas permeability of the PIM-1 membrane but greatly improves the CO2 selectivity, especially for CO2/CH4 separation. The membranes with 2.5 wt% PEG at different MWs have excellent separation performance for CO2/CH4 separation, which surmounts the 2008 upper bound line. Specifically the membrane with 3.5 wt% PEG of 20 kDa has the CO2 permeability of 1952 barrer and CO2/CH4 selectivity of 39.0 that is more than three times that of the pure PIM-1 membrane. The as-prepared PIM-1/PEG membranes have a great potential for CO2 separation. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据