4.7 Article

Positively-charged nanofiltration membrane formed by quaternization and cross-linking of blend PVC/P(DMA-co-MMA) precursors

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 492, 期 -, 页码 187-196

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.019

关键词

Amphiphilic copolymer; Tertiary amine; Quaternization and cross-linking; Polyvinyl chloride; Nanofiltration membranes

资金

  1. National 863 Program [2012AA03A602]
  2. Nature Science Foundation Committee [20974094, 51103130]
  3. National 973 program [2009CB623402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To explore low-pressure-driven nanofiltration (LPDNF) membranes with high permeate flux, a novel preparation route was proposed and investigated. First, an amphiphilic copolymer of poly (methyl methacrylate-co-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) (P(MMA-co-DMA)) was synthesized via free radical copolymerization, and then blended with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) to fabricate precursor membranes via non solvent induced phase separation (NIPS) process. Utilizing the quaternization and cross linking reaction between p-xylylene dichloride (XDC) and tertiary amine units in PVC/PMMA-co-DMA precursor membranes, positively charged PVC/PMMA-co-DMA LPDNF membranes were obtained. Element alanalysis, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy were employed to characterize the composition and morphology of the membranes. Effects of PMMA-co-DMA content and XDC concentration on the LPDNF membranes' performance were studied and discussed. With the optimized condition, the NF membrane showed the highest salt rejection (R) and water flux (J), e.g., R-MgCl2 = 89.1%, J(MgCl2) = 22.1 L/(m(2) h) and R-NaCl = 45.1%, J(NaCl) = 27.6 L/(m(2) h) at a pressure of 0.3 MPa. Besides, the rejections of the LPDNE: membranes for inorganic salts increased in an order of Na2SO4 < MgSO4 < NaCl < CaCl2 < MgCl2. Together with the good stability, PVC/PMMA-co-DMA blend membrane was approved as a promising positively charged LPDNF membranes. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据