4.7 Article

Enhanced anhydrous proton conductivity of polymer electrolyte membrane enabled by facile ionic liquid-based hoping pathways

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
卷 476, 期 -, 页码 136-147

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.11.033

关键词

Imidazole-type ionic liquid; Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone); Composite membrane; Anhydrous hoping site; Proton conductivity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21206151, U1407121]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M521409]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, a series of composite membranes based on sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) (SPEEK) and imidazole-type ionic liquid (ImIL) are prepared through IL-swollen method as anhydrous electrolytes for fuel cell. The IL loading amount is accurately controlled by preparation conditions (e.g., ultrasonic power, treatment temperature, and treatment time). The influence of IL on physicochemical properties of composite membrane is systematically investigated. The IL is enriched into the ionic clusters of SPEER matrix driven by electrostatic attractions, thereby broadening them to form inter-connected channels. IL provides anhydrous hoping sites and low-energy-barrier paths of imidazole-sulfonic acid pairs to composite membrane. Through the channels, these sites form facile pathways and significantly enhance the anhydrous conductivity of composite membrane. Particularly, the composite membrane containing 43% IL achieves a 52 Limes higher conductivity (9.3 mS cm(-1)) than that of the control membrane (0.179 mS cm(-1)) at 140 degrees C. Increasing IL loading amount will further elevate the anhydrous conductivity. The dynamic IL release and the concomitant conductivity of composite membrane are investigated. Moreover, another team of composite membranes are prepared by solution casting method for exploring the influence of preparation method on the microstructure, IL retention ability, and conductivity of IL-incorporated membrane. (C)2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据