4.7 Article

High performance polyimide composite films prepared by homogeneity reinforcement of electrospun nanofibers

期刊

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 71, 期 13, 页码 1556-1562

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.06.013

关键词

Carbon nanotubes; Nanocomposites; Polymer-matrix composites (PMCs); Mechanical properties; Electrospinning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20774019, 50873027]
  2. Outstanding Doctoral Research Foundation of Key Disciplines in Fudan University
  3. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [09SG02]
  4. Shanghai Education Development Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Highly aligned polyimide (PI) and PI nanocomposite fibers containing carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were produced by electrospinning. Scanning electron microscopy showed the electrospun nanofibers were uniform and almost free of defects. Transmission electron microscopy indicated that the CNTs were finely dispersed and highly oriented along the CNT/PI nanofiber axis at a relatively low concentration. The as-prepared well-aligned electrospun nanofibers were then directly used as homogeneity reinforcement to enhance the tensile strength and toughness of PI films. The neat PI nanofiber reinforced PI films showed good transparency, decreased bulk density and significantly improved mechanical properties. Compared with neat PI film prepared by solution casting, the tensile strength and elongation at break for the PI film reinforced with 2 wt.% CNT/PI nanofibers were remarkably increased by 138% and 104%, respectively. The significant increases in the overall mechanical properties of the nanofibers reinforced polyimide films can be ascribed to good compatibility between the electrospun nanofibers and the matrix as well as high nanofiber orientation in the matrix. Our study demonstrates a good example for fabricating high performance and high toughness polyimide nanocomposites by using this facile homogeneity self-reinforcement method. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据