4.7 Article

Reinforcement of interfacial and bonding strength of soybean meal-based adhesive via kenaf fiber-CaCO3 anchored N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulfenamide

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 204-211

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.08.017

关键词

Soybean meal adhesives; Bonding strength; Kenaf fibers; CaCO3; N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulfonamide

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0601205]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51779005/E090301]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016ZCQ01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of soybean meal-based adhesive is currently hindered by its weak bonding strength and poor water resistance. This study aims to develop a natural fiber-reinforced soybean meal adhesive with enhanced water resistance and bonding strength. To improve the interfacial interaction between the matrix and kenaf fiber (KF), the fiber was modified using a two-step process, (1) KF was treated with calcium carbonate (TKF) via an inorganic nanoparticle impregnation (INI) process; and (2) N-cyclohexyl-2-benzothiazole sulfenamide (CZ) was chemically bonded onto TKF to obtain the functionalized fiber (TKF-s-CZ). The bonded CZ molecules on TKF were found to have stronger interfacial interaction between TKF-s-CZ and the matrix, accelerating the cross linking reaction. The resultant PSM/TKF-s-CZ adhesive exhibited higher bonding strength and water-resistance than the control one. Compared to the control one, the wet shear strength of the PSM/TKF-s-CZ adhesive increased from 0.38 MPa to 1.64 MPa, counting for an increase of 331.57%. The moisture uptake was reduced to 8.75% (10.76% of the PSM/TKF adhesive). This work also provides a new design strategy for the surface modification of filler and prepares a renewable, value-added soybean meal-based adhesive, which could play an important role in expanding the industrialized applications of these adhesives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据