4.7 Article

Fabrication, process simulation and testing of a thick CFRP component using the RTM process

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 673-680

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.08.088

关键词

Resin Transfer Moulding (RTM); Cure; Finite element analysis (FEA); Mechanical testing

资金

  1. Regione Emilia Romagna within the funding program Dai distretti produttivi ai distretti tecnologici DGR [1631/2009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present article introduces the case of a CFRP con-rod beam, and describes many aspects regarding its production with the Resin Transfer Moulding (RTM) process. The objective was to find the best process parameters of the injection and curing stages in order to manufacture the 20 mm thick CFRP part. The results are analysed in terms of the aesthetic aspect, the porosity and the mechanical properties of the final component. For the resin injection stage, results obtained from production experiences are presented, which have been performed with different set-ups, and simulations of the resin flow are used to analyse them. The results show that the resin flow during injection could be rather unpredictable, probably because of the fibre rearrangement and race tracking effects. Improvements in terms of aesthetic aspect and porosity of the part could be achieved by a process which included final compaction of the cavity by means of compressed air. Regarding the curing stage, the article presents the simulation results of a curing cycle, and it's validation through DSC analysis of specimens obtained from the finished component. Finally, results of tensile mechanical tests are provided, performed on finished components produced by RTM and compared to others produced with the method of hand lay-up of pre-impregnated plies and curing in autoclave (Prepreg + Autoclave). The results confirm that it is possible to achieve components through RTM with comparable mechanical performance to those produced with the Prepreg + Autoclave process. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据