4.7 Article

Lightning strike damage resistance and tolerance of scarf-repaired mesh-protected carbon fiber composites

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.05.007

关键词

Carbon fiber; Electrical properties; Damage tolerance; Repair

资金

  1. Japanese Ministry of Defence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon fiber/epoxy composite specimens are manufactured using liquid resin infusion and incorporate a copper wire mesh on the outer layer for lightning strike protection. The specimens are then painted in order to be representative of an aircraft skin. The specimens are subjected to a scarf repair, which removes a portion of the wire mesh and of the carbon fiber substrate. The bonded repair is performed to re-establish the structural and electrical integrity of the laminate. Purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of repair procedure on the structural performance of the carbon/epoxy specimens following a lightning strike, and in particular it is aimed at comparing the two extreme cases where full electrical conductivity is re-established, and where the electrical conductivity is interrupted. To do so, the copper wire mesh is re-applied during the repair following two scenarios. The first, denoted as good repair, involves overlapping part of the repair mesh with the parent mesh surrounding the repair area, while the second, referred to as poor repair, involves applying a repair mesh that is shorter than the parent mesh, thereby leaving a gap in the electrical path. The repaired specimens are then subjected to simulated lightning strike at the location of the repair. The damage resistance characteristics of the repaired specimens are compared to the benchmark values of unprotected specimens (i.e. without copper mesh) and protected pristine specimens (i.e. without repair). Residual strength testing using four-point bend flexure is used to assess the damage tolerance behavior of the specimens. Results show that a good repair performs as well as the pristine protected specimen, while a poor repair performs equally or worse than a fully unprotected specimen. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据