4.7 Article

Lightweight design of carbon twill weave fabric composite body structure for electric vehicle

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 231-238

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.052

关键词

Carbon fabric composite plastic (CFRP); Lightweight; Multiscale approach; Crashworthiness

资金

  1. National Key Technology R & D Program of China [2011BAG02B02]
  2. New Teachers Fund for Doctor Stations by Ministry of Education of China [201017120003]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [S2011040004604]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Design of composite appears more challenging compared with metallic counterparts because of its microstructural heterogeneity and behavioral sophistication. This paper aims to develop a multiscale approach for predicting three-dimensional elastic model of carbon twill weave fabric composite which will be applied to crashworthiness analysis of body structure of electric vehicle. The geometric parameters were obtained by measuring the microstructure of T300 carbon twill weave fabric composite through optical microscopy. The finite element model of representative volume element (RVE) in laminate composite was established to characterize the elastic properties of the materials using the homogenization technique. The numerical results of property were compared with those from uniaxial tensile and three point bending tests. Finally, the constitutive model of such composite was employed to crashworthiness analysis for electric vehicle body structure under the roof crash and side pole impact. The study indicates that the deformation behaviors of laminate calculated by using the elastic properties are in good agreement with tensile and bending experimental results with maximum relative errors of 4.04% and 7.79%, respectively. Meanwhile, a 28% savings of body weight is achieved using the carbon twill weave fabric composite compared to its predecessor made of glass fiber reinforced plastics (GFRP). (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据