4.5 Article

Why signal softly? The structure, function and evolutionary significance of low-amplitude signals

期刊

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
卷 105, 期 -, 页码 253-265

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.04.017

关键词

communication; eavesdropping; sexual selection; short-range song; social behaviour; soft song

资金

  1. Animal Behavior Society
  2. National Science Foundation [DBI-1308567]
  3. Florida Atlantic University
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1308567] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acoustic signalling is a taxonomically widespread form of animal communication consisting of longrange, high-amplitude signals and short-range, low-amplitude signals. Research on acoustic communication has emphasized high-amplitude signals and often overlooked low-amplitude signals, even though they are produced in behavioural contexts that directly influence fitness. Low-amplitude signals are referred to by a variety of names such as soft songs, courtship songs, whispers, close calls, contact calls, grunts and moans, but all of these signals share a reduced amplitude and an active space that is limited to close-proximity receivers. In this review, we establish a general definition for low-amplitude signals and investigate the similarities and differences between low-and high-amplitude signals with respect to their acoustic structure and function. Then, we critically evaluate some proximate and ultimate evolutionary mechanisms that may explain why these signals are produced at low amplitude using examples from a variety of taxa. We conclude by suggesting priorities for future research on low-amplitude signals and highlighting how studying these signals will lead to a more complete understanding of how and why animals communicate acoustically. (C) 2015 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据