4.4 Article

Integration of molecular with higher-level effects of dietary zinc exposure in Daphnia magna

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbd.2008.09.001

关键词

Daphnia magna; Zinc; Dietborne exposure; Genomics; Microarrays; Gene expression

资金

  1. International Zinc Association (IZA)
  2. International Lead and Zinc Research Organization (ILZRO)
  3. Flanders Research Foundation [3G058506, 3G004606]
  4. Ghent University Research Fund [01 J09506, 01G010D8]
  5. Institute for the Promotion of Innovation by Science and Technology in Flanders ( [SB/23442]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We exposed Daphnia magna for 21 days to dietary Zn, incorporated in a diet of the green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata at 720 mu g Zn/g dry wt and compared its response to D. magna fed with a control diet (116 mu g Zn/g dry wt). Exposure to dietary Zn resulted in an increased body burden of D. magna (93.7 mu g/g dry wt vs. 61.3 mu g/g dry wt in the control) but did not affect survival, growth, or feeding rate. Only reproduction was significantly reduced from the 2nd brood onwards. Gene expression analysis, using microarray analysis and RT-PCR, showed that dietary Zn exposure resulted in the differential expression of several genes involved in molting-associated processes (i.e., chitin binding, cuticle metabolism), especially after 6 days of exposures (but not after 13 or 21 days of exposure). Monitoring of time to molt and intermolt-period confirmed this molting effect at the organism level in the first week of exposure. The data suggest a possible link between Zn-induced effects on molting-related processes and reproductive inhibition, but this link is only obvious for effects on the 2nd brood size and not for later broods. Reproductive inhibition in later broods may also be explained by a disturbed mitochondrial function, but more research is clearly needed to give a more definitive integrated explanation of the observed effects at the molecular and organism level. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据