4.4 Article

Geographical variation in thermal tolerance within Southern Ocean marine ectotherms

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.02.001

关键词

Nocella concinna; Laternula elliptica; Southern Ocean; Tissue biochemistry; Pejus limits; Critical limits; Lethal limits; Latitudinal comparisons

资金

  1. NERC
  2. MarCoPoll program
  3. NERC [bas010015, dml011000] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [dml011000, bas010015] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Latitudinal comparisons of the Southern Ocean limpet, Nacella concinna, and clam, Laternula elliptica, acclimated to 0.0 degrees C, were used to assess differences in thermal response to two regimes, 0.0, 5.1 to 10.0 degrees C and 2.5, 7.5 to 12.5 degrees C, raised at 5.0 degrees C per week. At each temperature, tissue energy status was measured through a combination Of O-2 consumption, intracellular pH, cCO(2), citrate synthase (CS) activity, organic acids (succinate, acetate, propionate), adenylates (ATP, ADP, AMP, ITP, PLA (phospho-L-arginine)) and heart rate. L elliptica from Signy (60 degrees S) and Rothera (67 degrees S), which experience a similar thermal regime (-2 to + 1 degrees C) had the same lethal (7.5-10.0 degrees C), critical (5.1-7.5 degrees C) and pejus (<5.1 degrees C; = getting worse) limits with only small differences in biochemical response. N. concinna, which experiences a wider thermal regime (-2 to + 15.8 degrees C), had higher lethal limits (10.0-12.5 degrees C). However, at their Northern geographic limit N. concinna, which live in a warmer environment (South Georgia, 54 degrees S), had a lower critical limit (5.1-10.0 degrees C; O-2, PLA and organic acids) than Rothera and Signy N. concinna (10.0-12.5 degrees C). This lower limit indicates that South Georgia N. concinna have different biochemical responses to temperatures close to their thermal limit, which may make them more vulnerable to future warming trends. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据