4.4 Article

Effects of temperature on the specific dynamic action of the southern catfish, Silurus meridionalis

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.11.003

关键词

temperature; specific dynamic action; Silurus meridionalis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Specific dynamic action (SDA), the energy expended on all physiological processes that is associated with meal digestion and assimilation, is strongly affected by temperature. We assessed the effects of temperature on the postprandial metabolic response and calculated SDA of the southern catfish, Silurus meridionalis. The fish was fed with experimental diets at a meal size of 4% body mass, and by using an 8-chamber, continuous-flow respirometer the oxygen consumption rate was determined at a 2 h interval until the postprandial oxygen consumption rate returning to the preprandial level, at four different temperatures. The energy expended on SDA (SDA(E)) were 2.71, 3.07, 3.16, and 3.62 kJ, the SDA(coefficients) (energy expended on SDA quantified as a percentage of the digestible energy content of the meal) were 7.70, 9.44, 10.36, and 11.12%, and the peak metabolic rates (R-peak) of SDA were 3.48, 4.31, 5.96, and 7.30 mg O-2 h(-1), at 17.5, 22.5, 27.5, and 32.5 degrees C respectively. The relationships between those parameters and temperature were: SDA(E)= 1.74+0.0559T (n=26, r(2)=0.676), SDA(coefficient)=4.10+0.223T (n=26, r(2)=0.726), and R-peak= -1.34+0.264T (n=2, r(2)=0.896). The SDA durations showed a slow-fast-slow tendency of decrease with increasing temperature, and were 88.00, 85.7 1, 67.71, and 66.50 h at 17.5, 22.5, 27.5 and 32.5 degrees C respectively. Two separate peaks appeared during the SDA response at 17.5 degrees C, and it might be due to a rapid startup of the mechanical process with a lag of the biochemical process, which suggested that the peaks of mechanical component and biochemical component of SDA might be separated when temperature was low enough. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据