4.7 Article

Human Papillomavirus Infections in Mexican Women With Normal Cytology, Precancerous Lesions, and Cervical Cancer: Type-Specific Prevalence and HPV Coinfections

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 87, 期 5, 页码 871-884

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.24099

关键词

human papillomavirus; cervical cancer; Linear Array((R)) HPV genotyping test; coinfections; Mexico

类别

资金

  1. IMSS [FIS/IMSS/PROT/G10/874, FIS/IMSS/PROT/G10/873, FIS/IMSS/PROT/G11/966, FIS/IMSS/PROT/G-11/985]
  2. CONACyT [2008-87474]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The prevalence and genotype distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) provides the basis for designing HPV prevention programs. The prevalence rates of type-specific HPV and coinfections in samples of Mexican women were investigated in 822 women aged 18-87 years. HPV detection was performed using a Linear Array(TM) genotyping test. HPV infection was found in 12.4% of controls, 46.3% of those with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1, and 100% of those with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3 or cervical cancer. HPV 16 was the most prevalent type in all diagnosis groups. The HPV types most frequently found in cervical cancers were 16, 18, 45, 52, 58, and 39; HPV types 16, 62, 51, 84, 18, 53, and CP6108 were the most prevalent in control women. Considering HPV-positive samples only, coinfections occurred most often in controls (63%) and were less frequent in those with cervical cancer (26%). The most frequent viral types in coinfections with HPV 16 in control women were HPV 62, 51, and 84; in women with cervical cancers, HPV 18, 39, and 70 were most common. In conclusion, in addition to HPV types 16 and 18, types 45, 39, 58, 52, and 71 were found in cervical cancers in Mexican women (78%); among them, only 65% were attributable to HPV types 16 and 18. Therefore, it is necessary to consider these viral types in the design of new vaccines, and to determine whether certain HPV types coinfecting with HPV 16 in precursor lesions determine tumor progression or regression. J. Med. Virol. 87:871-884, 2015. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据