4.3 Article

Soil Fertility Index, Soil Evaluation Factor, and Microbial Indices under Different Land Uses in Acidic Soil of Humid Subtropical India

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2011.622820

关键词

Available nutrients; exchangeable cations; land use; microbial activity; soil evaluation factor; soil fertility index

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A study was conducted to examine the impact of land use on soil fertility in an Entisol in the Jalpaiguri District of humid subtropical India. The natural forest served as a control against which changes in soil properties were compared. Soil samples were collected from four different depths (0-25, 25-50, 50-75, and 75-100 cm) of soil from four land uses (viz. forest, home garden, arecanut plantation, and agriculture) and examined for pH, organic carbon (OC), electrical conductivity (EC), cation exchange capacity, available nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), exchangeable calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), potassium (K), aluminum (Al), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) and dehydrogenase activity (DHA). Soil pH (5.7), OC (2.29%), N (386 kg ha(-1)), and P (22.54 kg ha(-1)) were greatest in forest soil, followed by soil from arecanut plantation, agriculture, and home garden. The greatest Ca (0.892 cmol kg(-1)), Mg (0.527 cmol kg(-1)), and Al (1.86 cmol kg(-1)) were found in the arecanut plantation, whereas K (0.211 cmol kg(-1)) was greatest in forest. The greatest content of diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid-extractable copper, zinc, manganese, and iron (2.25, 1.66, 4.86, and 7.65 ppm, respectively) were found in forest. MBC (558 mg kg(-1)), MBN (26.67 mg kg(-1)), and DHA (33.03 mu g TPF 24 h(-1) g(-1)) was greatest in forest soil. Soil fertility index varied from 13.13 in arecanut plantation to 18.49 in forest. The soil evaluation factor ranged from 5.32 in agriculture to 6.56 in forest. Pearson's correlation matrix revealed strongly significant positive correlation of soil fertility index and soil evaluation factor with soil properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据