4.3 Article

Fraction distributions of lead, cadmium, copper, and zinc in metal-contaminated soil before and after extraction with disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS
卷 39, 期 13-14, 页码 1963-1978

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00103620802134776

关键词

contaminated soil; disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ( EDTA); fraction distribution; heavy metal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fraction distributions of heavy metals have attracted more attention because of the relationship between the toxicity and their speciation. Heavy-metal fraction distributions in soil contaminated with mine tailings (soil A) and in soil irrigated with mine wastewater (soil B), before and after treatment with disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), were analyzed with Tessier's sequential extraction procedures. The total contents of lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn) exceeded the maximum permissible levels by 5.1, 33.3, 3.1, and 8.0 times in soil A and by 2.6, 12.0, 0.2, and 1.9 times in soil B, respectively. The results showed that both soils had high levels of heavy-metal pollution. Although the fractions were found in different distribution before extraction, the residual fraction was found to be the predominant fraction of the four heavy metals. There was a small amount of exchangeable fraction of heavy metals in both contaminated soils. Furthermore, in this study, the extraction efficiencies of Pb, Cd, and Cu were higher than those of Zn. After extraction, the concentrations of exchangeable Pb, Cd, Cu, and Zn increased 84.7mgkg-1, 0.3mgkg(-1), 4.1mgkg(-1), and 39.9mgkg(-1) in soil A and 48.7mgkg(-1), 0.6mgkg-1, 2.7mgkg(-1), and 44.1mgkg(-1) in soil B, respectively. The concentrations of carbonate, iron and manganese oxides, organic matter, and residue of heavy metals decreased. This implies that EDTA increased metal mobility and bioavailability and may lead to groundwater contamination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据