4.6 Article

Direct Numerical Simulation on Mach Number and Wall Temperature Effects in the Turbulent Flows of Flat-Plate Boundary Layer

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 189-212

出版社

GLOBAL SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.4208/cicp.221113.280714a

关键词

Hypersonic; directly numerical simulation; compressibility effects; turbulent boundary layer; strong Reynolds analogy

资金

  1. NSFC Projects [11072248]
  2. 973 Program [2009CB724100]
  3. 863 Program [2012AA01A304]
  4. CAS Information Project [INFO-115-B01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, direct numerical simulation (DNS) is presented for spatially evolving turbulent boundary layer over an isothermal flat-plate at Ma(infinity) = 2.25,5,6,8. When Ma(infinity) = 8, two cases with the ratio of wall-to-reference temperature T-w/T-infinity = 1.9 and 10.03 are considered respectively. The wall temperature approaches recovery temperatures for other cases. The characteristics of compressible turbulent boundary layer (CTBL) affected by freestream Mach number and wall temperature are investigated. It focuses on assessing compressibility effects and the validity of Morkovin's hypothesis through computing and analyzing the mean velocity profile, turbulent intensity, the strong Reynolds analogy (SRA) and possibility density function of dilatation term. The results show that, when the wall temperature approaches recovery temperature, the effects of Mach number on compressibility is insignificant. As a result, the compressibility effect is very weak and the Morkovin's hypothesis is still valid for Mach number even up to 8. However, when Mach number equal to 8, the wall temperature effect on the compressibility is sensitive. In this case, when T-w/T-infinity = 1.9, the Morkovin's hypothesis is not fully valid. The validity of classical SRA depends on wall temperature directly. A new modified SRA is proposed to eliminate such negative factor in near wall region. Finally the effects of Mach number and wall temperature on streaks are also studied.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据