4.6 Article

Numerical Study of Stability and Accuracy of the Immersed Boundary Method Coupled to the Lattice Boltzmann BGK Model

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS IN COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 136-168

出版社

GLOBAL SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.4208/cicp.260313.291113a

关键词

Immersed boundary method; lattice Boltzmann method; fluid-structure interaction; flexible boundary; complex boundary; accuracy; stability; verification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [10572106, 10872153, 11172219]
  2. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20130141110013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper aims to study the numerical features of a coupling scheme between the immersed boundary (IB) method and the lattice Boltzmann BGK (LBGK) model by four typical test problems: the relaxation of a circular membrane, the shearing flow induced by a moving fiber in the middle of a channel, the shearing flow near a non-slip rigid wall, and the circular Couette flow between two inversely rotating cylinders. The accuracy and robustness of the IB-LBGK coupling scheme, the performances of different discrete Dirac delta functions, the effect of iteration on the coupling scheme, the importance of the external forcing term treatment, the sensitivity of the coupling scheme to flow and boundary parameters, the velocity slip near non-slip rigid wall, and the origination of numerical instabilities are investigated in detail via the four test cases. It is found that the iteration in the coupling cycle can effectively improve stability, the introduction of a second-order forcing term in LBGK model is crucial, the discrete fiber segment length and the orientation of the fiber boundary obviously affect accuracy and stability, and the emergence of both temporal and spatial fluctuations of boundary parameters seems to be the indication of numerical instability. These elaborate results shed light on the nature of the coupling scheme and may benefit those who wish to use or improve the method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据