4.7 Article

Combustion of micron-aluminum and hydrogen peroxide propellants

期刊

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
卷 160, 期 1, 页码 184-190

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.10.001

关键词

Micron-aluminum; Hydrogen peroxide; Burning rate; Statistical analysis

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA-9550-11-1-0002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper we report the burning rate characteristics of hydrogen peroxide and micron-aluminum propellants. Theoretical calculations show that the sea level specific impulse of this simple binary mixture is comparable to standard composite propellant. In addition, the aluminum particle size, hydrogen peroxide concentration, and mixture ratio can be adjusted over a flat peak performance regime to attain specific thrust profiles and durations. We measured the burning rates in a windowed pressure vessel at pressures ranging from 7 to 14 MPa. Results show that mixture burning rates span from 0.5 to 4.5 cm/s at 7 MPa with power law burning rate pressure exponents ranging from 0.33 to 1.07. In this study, we focus a statistical analysis on the determination of the most influential variables affecting the burning rate and apply a thermal analysis to determine the combustion regimes of these mixtures. The statistical analysis provided a multivariate regression model for the logarithm of the burning rate with a correlation coefficient of 0.93. The model suggests aluminum diameter is the most important factor affecting the overall burning rate, and H2O2 concentration as the most influential variable on the burning rate pressure dependence. The burning rate dependence on theoretical combustion temperature shows two distinct combustion regimes attributed to kinetic and diffusion controlled combustion. A simple thermal analysis confirms the experimental burning rate pressure dependence observed for these two regimes. (C) 2012 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据