4.7 Article

The kinetics of oxidation of Diesel soots by NO2

期刊

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
卷 159, 期 1, 页码 77-90

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.06.009

关键词

Soot; Particulate matter; Nitrogen dioxide; Oxidation; Diesel Particulate Filter

资金

  1. EPSRC
  2. Johnson Matthey Plc.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The kinetics of oxidation of three soots, from a Diesel engine fuelled by either Ultra-Low Sulphur Diesel (ULSD) or biodiesel, by NO2 have been measured in a packed bed at various temperatures (300-550 degrees C) and [NO2] (20-880 ppm) relevant to regenerating a Diesel Particulate Filter. Adsorbed hydrocarbons and oxygen accounted for a significant fraction (similar to 20% by mass) of the otherwise carbonaceous material. After pre-treatment (heating up to 550 degrees C in a flow of pure Ar and holding the temperature at 550 degrees C for 1 h) to ensure consistency between samples, they were subsequently burned at a fixed temperature in a flow of NO2 + Ar. For this, a balance on oxygen atoms entering and leaving the packed bed showed that during oxidation in NO2 any oxygen remaining in a soot after pre-treatment was not rapidly liberated as CO or CO2. A mass balance on the element nitrogen demonstrated that no N-2 or N2O was formed below 550 degrees C; mass balances on carbon and oxygen demonstrated that all the carbon ended up as CO or CO2 and below 550 degrees C the nitrogen yielded only NO. The oxidation of soot in NO2 was found to be first-order with respect to NO2. Also, the soot derived from biodiesel was more reactive than soot from ULSD; nevertheless, the apparent activation energies for oxidation by NO2 were the same (70 +/- 18 kJ mol(-1)) for each carbon. When the distribution of diameters of the individual spherules of soot was taken into account, it was not possible to tell whether there was internal burning of porous spherules or, on the other hand, non-porous, solid spherules were burning on their exteriors. (C) 2011 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据