4.7 Article

An improved H2/O2 mechanism based on recent shock tube/laser absorption measurements

期刊

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
卷 158, 期 4, 页码 633-644

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.10.002

关键词

H-2/O-2 mechanism; Laser absorption; Shock tubes; Hydrogen; Oxygen

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [0649936]
  2. Department of Energy, [Office of Basic Energy Sciences] [DE-FG02-88ER13857]
  3. Department of Energy [National Nuclear Security Administration] [NA28614]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-88ER13857] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0649936] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An updated H-2/O-2 reaction mechanism is presented that incorporates recent reaction rate determinations in shock tubes from our laboratory. These experiments used UV and IR laser absorption to monitor species time-histories and have resulted in improved high-temperature rate constants for the following reactions: H + O-2 = OH + O H2O2(+M) = 2OH(+M) OH + H2O2 = HO2 + H2O O-2 + H2O = OH + HO2 The updated mechanism also takes advantage of the results of other recent rate coefficient studies, and incorporates the most current thermochemical data for OH and HO2. The mechanism is tested (and its performance compared to that of other H-2/O-2 mechanisms) against recently reported OH and H2O concentration time-histories in various H-2/O-2 systems, such as H-2 oxidation, H2O2 decomposition, and shock-heated H2O/O-2 mixtures. In addition, the mechanism is validated against a wide range of standard H-2/O-2 kinetic targets, including ignition delay times, flow reactor species time-histories, laminar flame speeds, and burner-stabilized flame structures. This validation indicates that the updated mechanism should perform reliably over a range of reactant concentrations, stoichiometries, pressures, and temperatures from 950 to greater than 3000 K. (C) 2010 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据