4.7 Article

Flame lift-off length and soot production of oxygenated fuels in relation with ignition delay in a DI heavy-duty diesel engine

期刊

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
卷 158, 期 3, 页码 525-538

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.10.003

关键词

Lift-off length; Ignition delay; Soot luminosity; Internal combustion engine; Oxygenates

资金

  1. Technology Foundation STW

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relation between ignition delay and flame lift-off length (based on OH* chemiluminescence) has been studied in an optically accessible heavy-duty diesel engine. Soot production has been studied as well, using both exhaust soot data and high-speed imaging of the in-cylinder natural luminosity. Since the luminosity is estimated to scale with T-13 for our experimental conditions, the local temperature becomes a decisive factor in the interpretation of natural luminosity images. The fuels used include regular diesel and blends of various oxygenates (cyclohexanone, anisole, and dibutyl maleate) with synthetic diesel, to cover a wide range of cetane numbers and oxygen content. Based on a literature review, we hypothesize that the flame speed only determines an upper limit for the flame lift-off length (rather than its exact position). Under conditions that promote auto-ignition, the lift-off length may be shorter, and is likely governed by ignition chemistry. For the oxygenated fuels, the flame lift-off length is found to increase with ignition delay. An inverse correlation is found between the soot luminosity and the oxygen ratio at the lift-off length. The anisole-blend does not produce measurable amounts of exhaust soot as long as the injection duration is shorter than the ignition delay. Under cooled EGR-like conditions, the ignition delay is so large that anisole is considered a candidate fuel for soot-free operation of heavy-duty diesel engines up to medium load. (C) 2010 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据