4.7 Article

Study of the H plus O plus M reaction forming OH•: Kinetics of OH• chemiluminescence in hydrogen combustion systems

期刊

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
卷 157, 期 7, 页码 1261-1273

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.04.003

关键词

Chemiluminescence; Hydrogen combustion; Reaction mechanism; Shock tube

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation, DFG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The temporal variation of OH center dot (A(2)Sigma(+)) chemiluminescence in hydrogen oxidation chemistry has been studied in a shock tube behind reflected shock waves at temperatures of 1400-3300 K and at a pressure of 1 bar. The aim of the present work is to obtain a validated reaction scheme to describe OH center dot formation in the H-2/O-2 system. Temporal OH center dot emission profiles and ignition delay times for lean and stoichiometric H-2/O-2 mixtures diluted in 97-98% argon were obtained from the shock-tube experiments. Based on a literature review for the hydrogen combustion system, the key reaction considered was H + O + M = OH* + M (R1). The temperature dependence of the measured peak OH center dot emission from the shock tube and the peak OH center dot concentration from a homogeneous closed reactor model are compared. Based on these results a reaction rate coefficient of k(1) = (1.5 +/- 0.4) x 10(13) exp(-25 kJ mol(-1)/RT) cm(6) mol(-2) s(-1) was found for the forward reaction (R1) which is slightly higher than the rate coefficient suggested by Hidaka et al. (1982). The comparison of measured and simulated absolute concentrations shows good agreement. Additionally, a one-dimensional laminar premixed low-pressure flame calculation was performed for where absolute OH center dot concentration measurements have been reported by Smith et al. (2005). The absolute peak OH center dot concentration is fairly well reproduced if the above mentioned rate coefficient is used in the simulation. (C) 2010 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据