4.7 Article

Investigation of the effect of chemistry models on the numerical predictions of the supersonic combustion of hydrogen

期刊

COMBUSTION AND FLAME
卷 156, 期 4, 页码 826-841

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2009.01.008

关键词

Supersonic combustion; Numerical simulations; Supersonic reacting flow; Hydrogen detailed chemistry; Scramjet

资金

  1. Ramanujachari of Defence Research and Development Lab, Hyderabad, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this numerical study, the influence of chemistry models on the predictions Of Supersonic combustion in a model combustor is investigated. To this end, 3D, compressible, turbulent, reacting flow calculations with a detailed chemistry model (with 37 reactions and 9 species) and the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence model have been carried Out. These results are compared with earlier results obtained using single step chemistry. Hydrogen is used as the fuel and three fuel injection schemes, namely, strut, staged (i.e., strut and wall) and wall injection, are considered to evaluate the impact of the chemistry models oil the flow field predictions. Predictions of the mass fractions of major species, minor species, dimensionless stagnation temperature, dimensionless Static pressure rise and thrust percentage along the combustor length are presented and discussed. Overall performance metrics such as mixing efficiency and combustion efficiency are Used to draw inferences oil the nature (whether mixing- or kinetic-control led) and the completeness of the combustion process. The predicted values of the dimensionless wall static pressure are compared with experimental data reported in the literature. The calculations show that Multi step chemistry predicts higher and more wide spread heat release than what is predicted by single step chemistry, In addition, it is also shown that multi step chemistry predicts intricate details of the combustion process Such as the ignition distance and induction distance. (c) 2009 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据