4.7 Article

Diminishing biofilm resistance to antimicrobial nanomaterials through electrolyte screening of electrostatic interactions

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 392-399

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.09.018

关键词

(+) Alpha tocopheryl phosphate; Antimicrobial; Resistance; Tooth enamel; Nanomaterial; Oral biofilm; Penetration; Electrolyte screening; Biological interactions

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) CASE award
  2. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. [11330281]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extracellular polymer substances (EPS) generated by biofilms confers resistance to antimicrobial agents through electrostatic and steric interactions that hinder molecular diffusion. This resistance mechanism is particularly evident for antibacterial nanomaterials, which inherently diffuse more slowly compared to small organic antibacterial agents. The aim of this study was to determine if a biofilm's resistance to antibacterial nanomaterial diffusion could be diminished using electrolytes to screen the EPS's electrostatic interactions. Anionic (+) alpha-tocopherol phosphate (alpha-TP) liposomes were used as the antimicrobial nanomaterials in the study. They self-assembled into 700 nm sized structures with a zeta potential of -20 mV that were capable of killing oral bacteria (S. oralis growth inhibition time of 3.34 +/- 0.52 h). In a phosphate (-ve) buffer the -ve alpha-TP liposomes did not penetrate multispecies oral biofilms, but in a Tris (hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (+ ve) buffer they did (depth - 12.4 +/- 3.6 mu m). The Tris did not modify the surface charge of the alpha-TP nanomaterials, rather it facilitated the alpha-TP-biofilm interactions through electrolyte screening (Langmuir modelled surface pressure increase of 2.7 +/- 1.8 mN/m). This data indicated that EPS resistance was mediated through charge repulsion and that this effect could be diminished through the co-administration of cationic electrolytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据