4.7 Article

Letrozole dispersed on poly (vinyl alcohol) anchored maleic anhydride grafted low density polyethylene: A controlled drug delivery system for treatment of breast cancer

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 116, 期 -, 页码 169-175

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.12.040

关键词

Letrozole; LDPE; Poly(vinyl alcohol); Controlled release; In vitro

资金

  1. Ministry of Human Resource and Development (MHRD), Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present work focuses on the design of a drug delivery system for systemic, controlled release of the poorly soluble breast cancer drug, letrozole. The drug delivery system was prepared in two steps: a low density polyethylene (LOPE) substrate surface was grafted with maleic anhydride (MA) via solution grafting technique. Next, the grafted substrate was used to anchor a hydrophilic polymeric drug release system consisting of poly (vinyl alcohol) (PVA). The PVA anchored MA grafted LDPE (PVA/MA-g-LDPE) drug release system was used for the controlled release of letrozole. This system was characterized using ATR-FTIR spectrophotometry, surface profilometry, and scanning electron microscopy. Biocompatibility studies were also carried out. In vitro release studies of letrozole from the system were performed in distilled water and phosphate buffer saline (PBS) at 37 degrees C. Release of similar to 90% letrozole from hydrophilic PVA matrix was observed within a period of 35 days. A high correlation coefficient (R-2 = 0.99) was seen between the release of letrozole in distilled water and PBS. Cytotoxicity studies using MTT colorimetric assay suggested that all samples were biocompatible. It is concluded that the letrozole delivery system appears to overcome the limitations associated with letrozole by providing enhanced drug dissolution rate, controlled release and improved bioavailability of the incorporated drug and, therefore, seems to have extended therapeutic effects. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据