4.7 Article

Bactericidal properties and biocompatibility of a gentamicin-loaded Fe3O4/carbonated hydroxyapatite coating

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 123, 期 -, 页码 403-412

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.09.050

关键词

Implant-associated infection; Cementless arthroplasty; Drug delivery system; Biocoating; Biofilm prevention

资金

  1. Key Disciplines of Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [J50206]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51002095, 51372152, 30973038]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [12JC1405600]
  4. Program of Shanghai Normal University [DZL124, DCL201303]
  5. Innovation Foundation of Shanghai Education Committee [14ZZ124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Postoperative implant-associated infection remains a serious complication in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) surgery. The addition of antibiotics to bone cement is used as an antimicrobial prophylaxis in cemented joint arthroplasty; however, in cementless arthroplasty, there are no comparable measures for the local delivery of antibiotics. In this study, a gentamicin-loaded Fe3O4/carbonated hydroxyapatite coating (Gent-MCHC) was fabricated according to the following steps: (i) deposition of Fe3O4/CaCO3 particles on Ti6Al4V substrates by electrophoretic deposition; (ii) conversions of MCHC from Fe3O4/CaCO3 coatings by chemical treatment; and (iii) formation of Gent-MCHC by loading gentamicin into MCHC. MCHC possessed mesoporous structure with a pore size of about 3.8 nm and magnetic property with the saturation magnetization strength of about 4.03 emu/g. Gent-MCHC had higher drug loading efficiency and drug release capacity, and superior biocompatibility and mitogenic activity than Ti6Al4V. Moreover, Gent-MCHC deterred bacterial adhesion and prevented biofilm formation. These results demonstrate that Gent-MCHC can be used as a local drug delivery system to prevent implant-associated infection in TJA surgery. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据