4.7 Article

Biocompatibility of poly(lactic acid) with incorporated graphene-based materials

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 104, 期 -, 页码 229-238

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.12.006

关键词

Topography; Wettability; Cytotoxicity; Platelets; Hemocompatibility

资金

  1. FEDER, through Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade - COMPETE
  2. National Funding through FCT - Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [PTDC/EME-PME/114808/2009]
  3. [SFRH/BPD/63722/2009]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/EME-PME/114808/2009] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The incorporation of graphene-based materials has been shown to improve mechanical properties of poly(lactic acid) (PLA). In this work, PLA films and composite PLA films incorporating two graphene-based materials - graphene oxide (GO) and graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) - were prepared and characterized regarding not only biocompatibility, but also surface topography, chemistry and wettability. The presence of both fillers changed the films surface topography, increasing the roughness, and modified the wettability - the polar component of surface free energy increased 59% with GO and decreased 56% with GNP. Mouse embryo fibroblasts incubated with both fillers exceeded the IC50 in both cases with a concentration of 10 mu g mL(-1). No variations in cell proliferation at the surface of the composite films were observed, except for those containing GO after 24h incubation, which presented higher cell proliferation than pristine PLA films. Platelet adhesion to PLA and PLA/GNP films was lower in the presence of plasma proteins than when no proteins were present. Furthermore, incorporation of GNP into PLA reduced platelet activation in the presence of plasma proteins. The results indicated that low concentrations of GO and GNP may be incorporated safely in PLA to improve aspects relevant for biomedical applications, such as mechanical properties. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据