4.7 Article

Complexation behavior of gelatin with amphiphilic drug imipramine hydrochloride as studied by conductimetry, surface tensiometry and circular dichroism studies

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 82, 期 1, 页码 258-262

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.08.043

关键词

Gelatin; Imipramine hydrochloride; Critical aggregation concentration; Polymer saturation point

资金

  1. UPCST Lucknow India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein we report our studies carried out on the Inter action between IMP and gelatin in aqueous medium at 25 C using conductimetry surface tensiometry and circular dichroism (CD) techniques Both surface tensiometry and conductimetry results indicate that the drug interacts with the gelatin in a surfactant like manner i e both critical aggregation (cac) and polymer saturation points (psp) were observed The interaction starts with the formation of a highly surface active complex as revealed by the lowering of surface tension on the addition of drug to the macromolecule The decrease in cac on increasing gelatin concentration is an indication of the strong interaction between gelatin and IMP However at low con centration of gelatin the interaction was not much strong as exposed by surface tension study le the cac was not very clear (as with higher gelatin concentrations) As usual the psp increased on increasing the gelatin concentration and was always higher than the critical micelle concentration of the drug in pure aqueous medium Using CD measurements the influence of IMP on the secondary structure of gelatin in aqueous solutions was also investigated CD studies (performed at very low drug concentrations) illustrated that the random coil content of gelatin increases with increasing drug concentration Free energies of aggregation (Delta G(agg)) and micellization (Delta G(mic)) were computed with the help of degrees of micelle ionization obtained from the specific conductivity - [IMP] plots (C) 2010 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据