4.7 Article

Impact of interfacial composition on emulsion digestion and rate of lipid hydrolysis using different in vitro digestion models

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 83, 期 2, 页码 321-330

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.12.001

关键词

Oil-in-water emulsion; Digestion; Lipolysis; Whey protein isolate; Soy protein isolate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A sequential in vitro model of digestion was used to investigate the changes in the physicochemical properties of emulsions during gastrointestinal transit. Oil-in-water emulsions were prepared with whey protein isolate (WPI) or soy protein isolate (SPI) at the same protein concentration (1.5%). Despite pepsinolysis of both proteins during the gastric phase, emulsions stabilized with WPI were more stable compared to those prepared with SPI. For both emulsions, the size of the oil droplets, which plays a critical role in lipid digestion, was extensively altered during the duodenal phase due to the presence of bile salts (BS) and phospholipids (PL). As shown by zeta-potential measurements, the results suggested the displacement of both proteins from the interface by BS: however, the displacement was much faster for the WPI-emulsions. The change in interfacial composition of the oil droplets was significantly affected by inclusion of PL and phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)) in the in vitro digestion model. The interfacial activity of pancreatic triglyceride lipase (PTL) was markedly affected in the presence of the surface-active compounds present in the digestive fluids, including BS, PL, colipase (COL) and PLA(2). A higher percentage of lipid hydrolysis was obtained in the presence of COL and PLA(2) than with BS alone or mixed BS-PL SPI-emulsions consistently showed a higher degree of lipolysis compared to the WPI-emulsions regardless of the in vitro digestion model used. The results support the conclusion that the interfacial composition of the original emulsion plays a major role in determining the extent of lipolysis. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据