4.7 Article

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of Ag nanoparticles biosynthesized by Lippia citriodora (Lemon Verbena)

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 81, 期 1, 页码 67-73

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.06.025

关键词

Silver nanoparticles; Biosynthesis; Lippia citriodora; Isoverbascoside

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/37547/2007, SFRH/BPD/35036/2007, REDE/1501/REM/2005]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/35036/2007, SFRH/BD/37547/2007] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to develop a simple biological method for the synthesis of Ag nanoparticles (AgNPs) using Lippia citriodora leaves aqueous extract as reducing agent. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and visible absorption spectroscopy (UV-vis) confirmed the reduction of silver ions to AgNPs. Stable, spherical crystalline AgNPs with well defined dimensions (average size of 15-30 nm) were obtained, on treating aqueous silver nitrate with the plant leaf aqueous extract. The kinetic of particles formation was proportional to the effect of reducing agent concentration and was enhanced by the increase of temperature from 25 degrees C to 95 degrees C. Time, temperature and extract concentration did not influence significantly the shape and size of nanoparticles. In order to identify the compounds responsible for the bioreduction of silver ions and stabilization of the AgNPs formed, we investigated the constituents of L. citriodora aqueous extract by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and mass spectrometry (MS). The main compounds found were verbascoside, isoverbascoside, chrysoeriol-7-O-diglucoronide and luteonin-7-O-diglucoronide. The data obtained suggests that the isoverbascoside compound is responsible for Ag+ ions reduction and act as capping agents of the nanoparticles afterwards. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据