4.7 Article

Preparation and characterization of thermo-responsive amphiphilic triblock copolymer and its self-assembled micelle for controlled drug release

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 94-100

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.03.020

关键词

Thermo-responsive micelles; Amphiphilic triblock copolymer; Preparation; Self-assembly; Controlled drug release

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [50273010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An amphiphilic thermo-responsive ABA triblock copolymer, poly(methyl methacrylate)-b-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide-co-poly(ethylene-glycol) methyl ether methacrlate)-b-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA-b-P(NIPAM-co-PEGMEMA)-b-PMMA), was designed and synthesized via reversible addition fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization, and subsequently characterized by FT-IR, H-1 NMR and GPC. The copolymer can disperse in water and self-assemble into nanoscaled micelles in a flower-like arrangement at room temperature; the hydrophobic PMMA tucks in the core while the hydrophilic and improved biocompatible P(NIPAM-co-PEGMEMA) forms a thermosensitive outer shell. The resulting micelles were investigated using fluorescence spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering technique (DLS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The copolymer exhibited a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of around 39 degrees C via optical transmittance measurements. Notably, there was no copolymer precipitation observed at the LCST, which was propitious to in vivo use of the micelle. The micelles loaded with folic acid as a model drug showed a desired thermo-responsive drug release behavior. It was found that the rate and amount (maximum percentage 85%) of the drug release was much higher above the LCST than that (maximum percentage 36%) below the LCST. These results indicate that the thermosensitive triblock copolymer possesses promising potential applications as a smart drug carrier in biomedical science. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据