4.6 Article

Comparative corrosion resistance of graphene sheets with different structures in waterborne epoxy coatings

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.08.045

关键词

Graphene sheet; Waterborne epoxy; Corrosion protection; Barrier effect; Electrochemistry

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51775540]
  2. Program for Excellent Young Talents, JXUST [JXUSTQJBJ2016011]
  3. Zhejiang Province Key Technology Project [2015C01006]
  4. Ningbo Municipal Nature Science Foundation [2017A610049]
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS [2017338]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although substantial statements report the capability of graphene for corrosion prevention, its further application is limited by the non-comprehension of its structural variation in different coatings. Herein, graphene sheets with four structures were incorporated waterborne epoxy to fabricate different types of composite coatings (named EP-G(a), EP-G(b), EP-GO and EP-GS, respectively) as well as the pure waterborne epoxy coating was fabricated for comparison. The corrosion behaviors of as-fabricated coatings with and without graphene sheets were systematically characterized via potential, impedance testing and Tafel curves by immersing in 3.5 wt % NaCl solution. It was remarkable to point out that EP-G(a) composite coating could possess a promising long-term corrosion protection capability. The corrosion protection mechanism of graphene-based composite coatings were verified as the barrier effect of impermeable graphene sheets that confirmed by the analysis of corrosion products. Moreover, the scanning vibrating electrode technique in-depth revealed the relationship between the graphene structures and corrosion performances of the composite coatings. With the occurrence of commercialized application of graphene-based coatings, these works displayed a suitable approach toward the long-term corrosion behavior, which was able to be extended to other two-dimensional materials for anti-corrosion coatings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据