4.6 Article

Cotransport of clay colloids and viruses in water saturated porous media

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.10.018

关键词

Viruses; Phi X174; MS2; Clay colloids; KGa-1b; STx-1b; Cotransport

资金

  1. European Union
  2. Greek National Funds through the Operational program Education and Lifelong Learning under the action Aristeia I [1185]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the cotransport of clay colloids and viruses in laboratory packed columns. Bacteriophages MS2 and Phi X174 were used as model viruses, kaolinite (kGa-1b) and montmorillonite (STx-1b) as model clay colloids, and glass beads as model packing material. The combined and synergistic effects of clay colloids and pore water velocity on virus transport and retention in porous media were examined at three pore water velocities (0.38, 0.74, and 1.21 cm/min). The results indicated that the mass recovery of viruses and clay colloids decreased as the pore water velocity decreased; whereas, for the cotransport experiments no clear trend was observed. Temporal moments of the breakthrough concentrations suggested that the presence of clays significantly influenced virus transport and irreversible deposition onto glass beads. Mass recovery values for both viruses, calculated based on total virus concentration in the effluent, were reduced compared to those in the absence of clays. The transport of both suspended and attached onto suspended clay-particles viruses was retarded, compared to the tracer, only at the highest pore water velocity. Moreover both clay colloids were shown to hinder virus transport at the highest pore water velocity. At the lower velocities MS2 transport was hindered and Phi X174 transport was facilitated with the exception of U=0.74 cm/min in the presence of KGa-1b. Both MS2 and Phi X174 were attached in greater amounts onto KGa-1b than STx-1b. Also, MS2 exhibited greater affinity than Phi X174 for both clays. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据