4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Initial stage of bridging flocculation of PSL particles induced by an addition of polyelectrolyte under high ionic strength

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.12.042

关键词

Polyelectrolyte; Bridging flocculation; Stretching of polyelectrolyte chain; High ionic strength; Initial stage dynamics

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22248025] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dynamics of colloidal flocculation of polystyrene latex (PSL) particles induced by cationic polyelectrolyte was studied in order to evaluate the effective layer thickness of adsorbing polyelectrolyte under sufficiently high ionic strength, where charges in polyelectrolyte chains are substantially shielded. The size of polyelectrolyte in the solution, a(p), was evaluated by the viscometry and by dynamic light scattering (DLS). Normalizing method of end-over-end rotation was adopted to analyze the initial-stage dynamics of flocculation. The rate of coagulation of monodispersed PSL particles induced by simple salt monitored by the Coulter Counter confirmed to be proportional to the initial number concentration, thus validating the method of analysis. Drimethylamino ethylmethacrylates with nominal molecular weights of 4.9 million and 2.0 million were tested as flocculants. In contrast to coagulation with a simple salt, the rate of flocculation just after the onset of mixing with polyelectrolyte was remarkably enhanced and then decreased or stopped abruptly after certain period. The protruding length of polyelectrolyte obtained from the enhancement of the rate of flocculation in the first stage, delta(He), was found to be several times larger than the size of polyelectrolyte in bulk solution determined by viscometry and DLS. Stretched conformation of polyelectrolyte chain in the mixing flow condition is the reason for the formation of apparently thick adsorbed polyelectrolyte layer. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据