4.6 Article

Removal of uranium(VI) from aqueous solutions by magnetic Mg-Al layered double hydroxide intercalated with citrate: Kinetic and thermodynamic investigation

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.08.031

关键词

Uranium; Magnetic Mg-Al layered double hydroxide; Citrate; Adsorption; Kinetics; Thermodynamics

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds of the Central University [HEUCFZ1107]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project from Education Department of Heilongjiang Province [11553044]
  3. High Education Doctoral Fund [160100110010]
  4. Special Innovation Talents of Harbin Science and Technology [2010RFXXG007]
  5. foundation of Harbin Engineering University [HEUFT07053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic Mg-Al layered double hydroxide was modified with citrate acid using a ion-exchange technique. It showed higher adsorption capacity for the uranium(VI) ions compared with magnetic Mg-Al layered double hydroxide without intercalating with citrate. This increasing capacity was mainly attributable to the formation of the citrate-metal complexes in the interlayer of the magnetic citrate.Mg-Al layered double hydroxide. Batch experiments were conducted to study the effects of pH, adsorbent dose, shaking time, and temperature on uranium sorption efficiency. The results reveal that the maximum adsorption capacity is 180.00 mg g(-1) when the initial uranium(VI) concentration is kept as 200 mg L-1 at 25 degrees C, displaying a high efficiency for the removal of uranium(VI) from aqueous solution. The sorption follows Freundlich model and pseudo-second-order kinetics. The thermodynamic parameters such as Delta H degrees, Delta S degrees and Delta G degrees show that the process is endothermic and spontaneous. In addition, the composite can be easily separated from the solution by a magnet after the adsorption process. This work provides an efficient, fast and convenient approach for the removal of uranium(VI) from aqueous solutions. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据