4.6 Article

Layer-by-layer assembled gold nanoparticles modified anode and its application in microbial fuel cells

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.09.032

关键词

Gold nanoparticle; Anode modification; Layer-by-layer assembly; Microbial fuel cell

资金

  1. Basic and Front-line Technological Research Project of Henan Province [112300410157, 102300410098]
  2. Innovation Scientists and Technicians Troop Construction Projects of Henan Province
  3. Scientific and Technological Innovation Outstanding Talent Plan of Henan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) as one type of green energy source are drawing great attention among researchers. Anode performance is an important factor limiting the power output of MFCs for practical application. In this paper, the gold nanoparticles (Au NPs) modified carbon paper electrode was successfully constructed by layer-by-layer assembly technique for the first time. UV-vis spectroscopy was used to monitor the regular layer growth of the {PEI/Au}(10) multilayer. The results of cyclic voltamnnetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in Fe(CN)(6)(3-/4-) solution demonstrated that the Au NPs modified carbon paper electrode exhibited better electrochemical behavior than the bare carbon paper electrode, including relatively high electroactive surface areas, increased electron transfer rate and decreased interfacial electron transfer resistance. A two-chambered MFC equipped with the modified anode achieved a maximum power density of 346 mW m(-2) and a start-time for the initial maximum stable voltage of 175 h, which were respectively 50% higher and 36% shorter than the corresponding values of the MFC with the unmodified anode. All the results indicated that the LBL assembly Au NPs-based modification on the anode was a simple but efficient method to incorporate Au NPs onto carbon paper electrodes and promoted the electricity generation of MFCs. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据