4.4 Article

Electrorheological properties of suspensions of hollow globular titanium oxide/polypyrrole particles

期刊

COLLOID AND POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 290, 期 1, 页码 41-48

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-011-2521-x

关键词

Electrorheology; Titanium oxide; Hollow globular clusters; Polypyrrole coating; Core-shell particles; Dielectric properties

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [MSM 7088352101]
  2. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [202/09/1626]
  3. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  4. national budget of the Czech Republic of Centre of Polymer Systems [CZ.1.05/2.1.00/03.0111]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hollow globular clusters of titanium oxide (TiO2) nanoparticles were synthesized by a simple hydrothermal method. The prepared particles were consequently coated by in situ polymerization of conductive polymer polypyrrole (PPy) to obtain novel core-shell structured particles as a dispersed phase in electrorheological (ER) suspensions. The X-ray diffraction analysis and scanning electron microscopy provided information on particle composition and morphology. It appeared that PPy coating improved the compatibility of dispersed particles with silicone oil which results in higher sedimentation stability compared to that of mere TiO2 particles-based ER suspension. The ER properties were investigated under both steady and oscillatory shears. It was found that TiO2/PPy particles-based suspension showed higher ER activity than that of mere TiO2 hollow globular clusters. These observations were elucidated well in view of their dielectric spectra analysis; a larger dielectric loss enhancement and faster interfacial polarization were responsible for a higher ER activity of core-shell structured TiO2/PPy-based suspensions. Investigation of changes in ER properties of prepared suspensions as a function of particles concentration, viscosity of silicone oil used as a suspension medium, and electric field strength applied was also performed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据