4.7 Article

Hardness estimation and weak layer detection in simulated snow stratigraphy

期刊

COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 103, 期 -, 页码 82-90

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.03.009

关键词

Snow stability; Snowpack stratigraphy; Snow cover modeling; Snow stability tests

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Numerical modeling of snow cover stratigraphy with, for example, the 1-D snow cover model SNOWPACK has the potential to increase the spatial and temporal resolutions of snow stratigraphy information data very much needed for avalanche forecasting. One of the key properties for interpreting snow stratigraphy in regard to stability is snow hardness. In manually observed snow profiles, differences in snow hardness between layers were found to be indicative of instability. We improved the hardness parameterization implemented in the snow cover model SNOWPACK. Hardness is estimated from the simulated snow density and grain type. Density thresholds for primary grain types and all hardness steps were calculated using ordinal logistic regression (on a data set of 14,522 manually observed layers). We thus implemented snow hardness as a discrete parameter in SNOWPACK The new hardness parameterization observed agreed well with the simulated snow hardness. The structural stability index (SSI), and the threshold sum approach (TSA) were then used to detect potential weak layers in the simulated stratigraphy. We evaluated whether failure layers detected with compression tests (CT) in manually observed snow profiles corresponded to the potential weak layers found by either the SSI or TSA in the simulated stratigraphy. CT failure layers corresponded in about half of the cases to the potential weak layers detected with either the SSI or the TSA in the simulated stratigraphy. The agreement improved if only sudden collapse fractures were considered. These findings suggest that stability information can be derived from simulated snow stratigraphy in particular if the method for detecting weak layers is further improved. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据