4.7 Article

Settlement characteristics of unprotected embankment along the Qinghai-Tibet Railway

期刊

COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 60, 期 1, 页码 84-91

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.08.002

关键词

Roughness; Slope orientation effect; Differential settlement; Warm and ice-rich permafrost (WIRP)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [40801022, 40730736]
  2. National Hi-Tech Research and Development Plan of China [2008AA11Z103]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-XB2-10]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [20080430110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study attempts to investigate the settlement characteristics of the unprotected embankment along the Qinghai-Tibet Railway. First, the investigation shows the observed data regarding the settlement of five adjacent unprotected embankment sections. Then, this data is estimated by using the fractal dimension to estimate the roughness of the embankment shoulder surface. Finally, a relationship between this roughness and the differential settlement between adjacent embankment sections is proposed. The result shows that currently the roughness along the north and south shoulder surfaces are 6.25e-8 and 8.92e-8, respectively. These values mean that the differential settlements between 20 m-distance sections along the north and south shoulder surfaces are 3 and 4.3 cm, respectively. Therefore, although the unprotected embankment has experienced significant settlement (maximum is 21 cm), the differential settlement between the 20 m-distance adjacent sections is still of lower magnitude. A prediction for the evolution of the differential settlement of the unprotected embankment shows that by 2020 the differential settlement along the north and south shoulder surfaces of the embankment may reach approximately 4.5 and 9.8 cm. The difference between these two values is 5.3 cm which would change the curvature of the tracks, and thus potentially risk the safety of the running trains. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据