4.0 Article

Empathic Deficits in Combat Veterans with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Voxel-Based Lesion-Symptom Mapping Study

期刊

COGNITIVE AND BEHAVIORAL NEUROLOGY
卷 25, 期 4, 页码 160-166

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e318280cf4e

关键词

empathy; emotion; prefrontal cortex; traumatic brain injury; voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping

资金

  1. US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Intramural Research Program
  2. US Army Medical Research and Material Command
  3. Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine via the Henry M. Jackson Foundation
  4. National Naval Medical Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To understand better which brain regions support emotional empathy. Background: Emotional empathy, the ability to interpret and share the affective states of others, is a key component in human social interaction. Previous research has suggested that emotional empathy relies on several distinct brain regions, although further evidence from human lesion studies is needed to determine which regions are critical. Methods: We studied 192 male Vietnam combat veterans who had sustained focal penetrating traumatic brain injuries, and 54 non-brain-injured veterans. We used voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping on computed tomographic scans to elucidate the neural bases of self-reported emotional empathy as measured by the Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale. Results: Damage in several brain regions, particularly the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, left and right posterior temporal lobes, and insula, was associated with diminished emotional empathy. Conclusions: These findings provide further insight into the neural substrates of emotional empathy, and are consistent with the notion that emotional empathy is supported by a distributed network of brain regions. Additional work may advance our understanding of the empathic deficits commonly observed in patients with neurologic and psychiatric disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据