4.2 Review

Using a drug-word Stroop task to differentiate recreational from dependent drug use

期刊

CNS SPECTRUMS
卷 19, 期 3, 页码 247-255

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1092852914000133

关键词

Addiction; attentional bias; recreational drug use; stimulant dependence; Stroop

资金

  1. Cambridge Overseas Trust
  2. Medical Research Council (MRC) [G0701497]
  3. Behavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute (BCNI)-MRC and Wellcome Trust [G00001354]
  4. MRC
  5. MRC [G0701497] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [G0001354, G0701497, G1000183B, G0001354B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Distinguishing dependent from recreational drug use can be a surprisingly difficult task, and the current means for identifying substance abuse can be inadequate or even misleading. In subjective self-reports, those who are most at risk may downplay their consumption, not admitting to the full extent of their habit, and measures purely of quantity of use rarely capture the true nature of an individual's relationship to the drug, such as a psychological dependence on the substance. This trend is particularly true for heavy stimulant use, which is absent of the physical withdrawal symptoms that can help identify opiate or alcohol dependence. As such, a simple objective measure to help identify substance abuse, particularly in individuals who might not otherwise raise suspicion, would be a valuable tool in both clinical and experimental settings. We propose that the drug-word Stroop task, an objective assessment of attentional bias and distraction to salient drug-related stimuli, would be a valuable tool in helping to make these categorizations. This measure has been shown to correlate with drug craving, as well as to successfully distinguish dependent from recreational stimulant users and to help to predict outcomes in treatment-seeking individuals. Here, we survey prior literature on the drug-word Stroop task and provide a perspective on using the assessment as a potential diagnostic for drug use severity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据