4.2 Article

Decision-Making and Prepotent Response Inhibition Functions in Excessive Internet Users

期刊

CNS SPECTRUMS
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 75-81

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1092852900000225

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Excessive Internet use (EIU), also described as Internet addiction or pathological Internet use, has already become a serious social problem around the world. Some researchers consider EIU as a kind of behavioral addiction. However, there are few experimental studies on the cognitive functions of excessive Internet users (ElUers) and limited data are available to compare EIU with other addictive behaviors, such as drug abuse and pathological gambling. Methods: In this study, we examined ElUers' functions of decision-making and prepotent response inhibition. Two groups of participants, ElUers and controls, were compared on these two functions by using a Gambling Task and a Go/no-go Task, respectively. Results: Compared with controls, ElUers selected significantly less net. decks in the Gambling Task (P=.007). Furthermore, the ElUers made progress in selecting strategy, but more slowly than did the control group (ElUers, chunk 3 > chunk 1, P<.001; controls, chunk 2 > chunk 1, P<.001). Interestingly, ElUers' accuracy during the no-go condition was significantly higher than that of controls (P=.018). Conclusion: These results showed some similarities and dissimilarities between ElU and other addictive behaviors such as drug abuse and pathological gambling. The findings from the Gambling Task indicated that ElUers have deficits in decision-making function, which are characterized by a strategy learning lag rather than an inability to learn from task contingencies. ElUers' better performance in the Go/no-go Task suggested some dissociation between mechanisms of decision-making and those of prepotent response inhibition. However, ElUers could hardly suppress their excessive online behaviors in real life. Their ability of inhibition,still needs to be further studied with more specific assessments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据