4.7 Review

Machine learning in major depression: From classification to treatment outcome prediction

期刊

CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS
卷 24, 期 11, 页码 1037-1052

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cns.13048

关键词

classification; machine learning; magnetic resonance imaging; major depressive disorder; review

资金

  1. National High-Tech Development Plan (863) [2015AA020513]
  2. NIH [1R01MH094524, P20GM103472, R01EB005846]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDBS01000000]
  4. 100 Talents Plan of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. Chinese Natural Science Foundation [61773380, 81471367]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims: Major depression disorder (MDD) is the single greatest cause of disability and morbidity, and affects about 10% of the population worldwide. Currently, there are no clinically useful diagnostic biomarkers that are able to confirm a diagnosis of MDD from bipolar disorder (BD) in the early depressive episode. Therefore, exploring translational biomarkers of mood disorders based on machine learning is in pressing need, though it is challenging, but with great potential to improve our understanding of these disorders. Discussions: In this study, we review popular machine-learning methods used for brain imaging classification and predictions, and provide an overview of studies, specifically for MDD, that have used magnetic resonance imaging data to either (a) classify MDDs from controls or other mood disorders or (b) investigate treatment outcome predictors for individual patients. Finally, challenges, future directions, and potential limitations related to MDD biomarker identification are also discussed, with a goal of offering a comprehensive overview that may help readers to better understand the applications of neuroimaging data mining in depression. Conclusions: We hope such efforts may highlight the need for an urgently needed paradigm shift in treatment, to guide personalized optimal clinical care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据