4.5 Article

Pharmacotherapy for Cannabis Dependence How Close Are We?

期刊

CNS DRUGS
卷 23, 期 7, 页码 543-553

出版社

ADIS INT LTD
DOI: 10.2165/00023210-200923070-00001

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institute on Drug Abuse [DA12471, DA025794, DA09236, DA19239]
  2. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [P50DA009236, R01DA012471, R01DA019239, R21DA025794] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cannabis is the most widely used illicit drug in the world. Treatment admissions for cannabis use disorders have risen considerably in recent years, and the identification of medications that can be used to improve treatment outcomes among this population is a priority for researchers and clinicians. To date, several medications have been investigated for indications of clinically desirable effects among cannabis users (e.g. reduced withdrawal, attenuation of subjective or reinforcing effects, reduced relapse). Medications studied have included those: (i) known to be effective in the treatment of other drug use disorders; (ii) known to alleviate symptoms of cannabis withdrawal (e.g. dysphoric mood, irritability); or (iii) that directly affect endogenous cannabinoid receptor function. Results from controlled laboratory studies and small open-label clinical studies indicate that buspirone, dronabinol, fluoxetine, lithium and lofexidine may have therapeutic benefit for those seeking treatment for cannabis-related problems. However, controlled clinical trials have not been conducted and are needed to both confirm the potential clinical efficacy of these medications and to validate the laboratory models being used to study candidate medications. Although the recent increase in research towards the development of pharmacotherapy for cannabis use disorders has yielded promising leads, well controlled clinical trials are needed to support broad clinical use of these medications to treat cannabis use disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据