4.3 Review

Targeting Generation of Antibodies Specific to Conformational Epitopes of Amyloid beta-Derived Neurotoxins

期刊

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL
DOI: 10.2174/187152709787601876

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; ADDL; oligomer; synapse; neurodegeneration; CNS neurons; disease-modifying therapeutics; diagnostics

资金

  1. Alzheimer's Association
  2. American Health Assistance Foundation
  3. Human Frontiers Science Foundation
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Individuals with early Alzheimer's disease (AD) suffer from a selective and profound failure to form new memories. A novel molecular mechanism with implications for therapeutics and diagnostics is now emerging in which the specificity of AD for memory derives from disruption of plasticity at synapses targeted by toxic A beta oligomers (also known as ADDLs). ADDLs accumulate in AD brain and constitute long-lived alternatives to the disease-defining A beta fibrils deposited in amyloid plaques. The AD-like cellular pathologies induced by ADDLs suggest their impact could provide a unifying mechanism for AD pathogenesis, explaining why early stage disease is specific for memory and accounting for major facets of AD neuropathology. Discovery of these new toxins has provided an appealing target for disease-modifying immunotherapy. For optimal protection against these toxins, antibodies should bind to the pathological oligomers without being depleted by their monomeric subunits, which are rapidly generated by membrane protein turnover. A solution to this problem is likely to come from the continued development of conformation-specific antibodies, as described here. Prototype conformation-specific antibodies, not yet in the clinic, have been introduced and utilized in multiple applications for their ability to bind with high specificity and affinity to ADDLs. It can be anticipated that further development of such antibodies for use in clinical trials will come in the near future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据