4.2 Article

Association between isolated abnormal levels of maternal serum unconjugated estriol in the second trimester and adverse pregnancy outcomes

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
卷 29, 期 13, 页码 2093-2097

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1075503

关键词

Estriol; fetal growth restriction; low birth weight; outcome; pregnancy

资金

  1. National Research University Project under Thailand's Office of the Higher Education Commission
  2. Diamond Research Grant of Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine the association between maternal serum unconjugated estriol (uE3) levels in the second trimester and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Patients and methods: The prospective database of our fetal Down screening program was assessed and reviewed for maternal serum uE3 levels. Pregnancies with medical diseases, abnormal levels of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin, alpha-fetoprotein and fetal chromosomal or structural abnormalities were excluded. The recruited women were categorized into three groups: high (>95th percentile), normal (5-95th percentile) and low (<5th percentile) uE3 levels. Results: Of 14 212 screened women, 9183 (high; 455, normal; 8271 and low; 457) levels group, were available for outcome analysis. The rates of most adverse outcomes, including preterm birth, low Apgar scores, fetal death, placental abruption, preeclampsia and gestational diabetes mellitus, of the high and normal groups were comparable. Nevertheless, low uE3 levels increased risk of fetal growth restriction (FGR) (RR: 2.36, 95% CI: 1.79-3.10) and low birth weight (LBW) (RR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.45-2.39), but not preterm birth. Logistic regression analysis indicated that low uE3 level was an independent risk factor for FGR and LBW. Conclusions: High uE3 levels in the second trimester are not associated with poor outcomes, whereas low levels significantly increase risk of FGR and LBW but not other adverse outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据