4.4 Article

SEQUENTIAL ALLOCATION TO BALANCE PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN A PSYCHIATRIC CLINICAL TRIAL

期刊

CLINICS
卷 64, 期 6, 页码 511-518

出版社

HOSPITAL CLINICAS, UNIV SAO PAULO
DOI: 10.1590/S1807-59322009000600005

关键词

Clinical research; Randomization; Aitchison's compositional distance

资金

  1. Brazilian governmental agencies
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  3. CNPq
  4. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development [521369/96-7]
  5. Funda ao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo
  6. FAPESP
  7. Foundation for the Support of Research in the State of Sao Paulo [2005/55628-08, 06/502730]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to describe and discuss a minimization procedure specifically designed for a clinical trial that evaluates treatment efficacy for OCD patients. METHOD: Aitchison's compositional distance was used to calculate vectors for each possibility of allocation in a covariate adaptive method. Two different procedures were designed to allocate patients in small blocks or sequentially one-by-one. RESULTS: We present partial results of this allocation procedure as well as simulated data. In the clinical trial for which this procedure was developed, successful balancing between treatment arms was achieved. Separately, in an exploratory analysis, we found that if the arrival order of patients was altered, most patients were allocated to a different treatment arm than their original assignment. CONCLUSION: Our results show that the random arrival order of patients determine different assignments and therefore maintains the unpredictability of the allocation method. We conclude that our proposed procedure allows for the use of a large number of prognostic factors in a given allocation decision. Our method seems adequate for the design of the psychiatric trials used as models. Trial registrations are available at clinicaltrials. gov NCT00466609 and NCT00680602.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据