4.3 Article

Depressive symptoms, frailty, and adverse outcomes among kidney transplant recipients

期刊

CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION
卷 32, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.13391

关键词

depressive symptoms; frailty; graft loss; kidney transplant recipients; kidney transplantation; mortality

资金

  1. Claude Pepper Older Americans Independence Center, Johns Hopkins [P30AG021334]
  2. National Institute on Aging [F32AG053025, K01AG043501, R01AG042504, R01AG055781]
  3. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [K23DK097184, K24DK101828, R01DK114074]
  4. NIH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Depressive symptoms and frailty are each independently associated with morbidity and mortality in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. We hypothesized that having both depressive symptoms and frailty would be synergistic and worse than the independent effect of each. In a multicenter cohort study of 773 KT recipients, we measured the Fried frailty phenotype and the modified 18-question Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D). Using adjusted Poisson regression and survival analysis, we tested whether depressive symptoms (CES-D score>14) and frailty were associated with KT length of stay (LOS), death-censored graft failure(DCGF), andmortality. AtKTadmission, 10.0% of patients exhibited depressive symptoms, 16.3% were frail, and 3.6% had both. Recipients with depressive symptoms were more likely to be frail(aOR=3.97, 95% CI: 2.28-6.91, P<0.001).Recipients with both depressive symptoms and frailty had a 1.88 times (95% CI: 1.70-2.08, P<0.001) longer LOS, 6.20-fold (95% CI:1.67-22.95, P<0.01)increased risk of DCGF, and 2.62-fold(95% CI:1.03-6.70, P=0.04)increased risk of mortality, compared to those who were nonfrail and without depressive symptoms. There was only evidence of synergistic effect of frailty and depressive symptoms on length of stay (P for interaction<0.001). Interventions aimed at reducing pre-KT depressive symptoms and frailty should be explored for their impact on post-KT outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据