4.3 Article

Primary Care-based, Pharmacist-physician Collaborative Medication-therapy Management of Hypertension: A Randomized, Pragmatic Trial

期刊

CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS
卷 36, 期 9, 页码 1244-1254

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.030

关键词

collaborative care; hypertension; medication-therapy management; MTM; pharmaceutical care; pharmacist

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [1RC2HL101811-01]
  2. NIH [UL RR031980, UL1TR000100]
  3. Clinical Scholars Program
  4. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  5. UCLA
  6. US Department of Veterans Affairs [67799]
  7. Resource Centers for Minority Aging Research Center for Health Improvement of Minority Elderly at UCLA (NIH/National Institute on Aging) [P30-AG021684]
  8. NIH/UCLA National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Clinical and Translational Science Awards [UL1TR000124]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: A collaborative pharmacist primary care provider (PharmD-PCP) team approach to medication-therapy management (MTM), with pharmacists initiating and changing medications at separate office visits, holds promise for the cost-effective management of hypertension, but has not been evaluated in many systematic trials. The primary objective of this study was to examine blood pressure (BP) control in hypertensive patients managed by a newly formed PharmD-PCP MTM team versus usual care in a university-based primary care clinic. Methods: This randomized, pragmatic clinical trial was conducted in hypertensive patients randomly selected for PharmD-PCP MTM or usual care. In the PharmD-PCP MTM group, pharmacists managed drug-therapy initiation and monitoring, medication adjustments, biometric assessments, laboratory tests, and patient education. In the usual-care group, patients continued to see their PCPs. Participants were aged >= 18 years, were diagnosed with hypertension, had a most recent BP measurement of >= 140/>= 90 mm Hg (>= 130/>= 80 mm Hg if codiagnosed with diabetes mellitus), were on at least 1 antihypertensive medication, and were English speaking. The primary outcome was the difference in the mean change from baseline in systolic BP at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included the percentage achieving therapeutic BP goal and the mean changes from baseline in diastolic BP and lowand high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Findings: A total of 166 patients were enrolled (69 men; mean age, 67.7 years; PharmD-PCP MTM group, n = 75; usual-care group, n = 91). Mean reduction in SBP was significantly greater in the PharmD-PCP MTM group at 6 months (-7.1 [19.4] vs +1.6 [21.0] mm Hg; P = 0.008), but the difference was no longer statistically significant at 9 months (-5.2 [16.9] vs -1.7 [17.7] mm Hg; P = 0.22), based on an intent-to-treat analysis. In the intervention group, greater percentages of patients who continued to see the MTM pharmacist versus those who returned to their PCP were at goal at 6 months (81% vs 44%) and at 9 months (70% vs 52%). No significant between-group differences in changes in cholesterol were detected at 6 and 9 months; however, the mean baseline values were near recommended levels. The PharmD-PCP MTM group had significantly fewer PCP visits compared with the usual-care group (1.8 [1.5] vs 4.2 [1.0]; P < 0.001). Published by Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据